Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIRC
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIRC

|

UNI-FIND

unirc.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Machine learning and ESG integration in portfolio optimization: theory and evidence

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2026
Citazione:
Machine learning and ESG integration in portfolio optimization: theory and evidence / Caristi, G., Barilla, D., Morabito, M., Ferrara, M.. - In: DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE. - ISSN 1593-8883. - (2026), pp. 1-21. [10.1007/s10203-026-00577-6]
Abstract:
We develop an integrated framework for ESG-constrained portfolio management that combines Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization of ESG variables, XGBoost-based return forecasting, constrained mean-variance optimization, Monte Carlo equilibrium analysis with heterogeneous investors, and TOPSIS-based multi-criteria portfolio selection. Using Russell 3000 data (2017–2022), we address three key challenges in sustainable asset management: (i) multicollinearity between ESG and traditional financial factors, resolved through orthogonalization that reduces factor correlations to R2<0.05; (ii) return prediction via machine learning, achieving out-of-sample R2≈8% compared to 3% for linear benchmarks; and (iii) portfolio optimization under binding ESG constraints with non-negativity, solved via quadratic programming. Our main findings are threefold. ESG mandates improve mean-variance efficiency for return targets below 4.56%, reconciling sustainability objectives with fiduciary duties. The equilibrium analysis reveals a negative ESG premium of approximately -45 basis points annually, driven by institutional demand rather than risk compensation. Out-of-sample backtesting confirms that the machine learning-optimized ESG portfolio delivers a Sharpe ratio of 0.72 versus 0.58 for the linear benchmark, with controlled turnover. The TOPSIS selection yields a balanced portfolio with a preference coefficient of 0.68, robust across alternative weighting schemes.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Caristi, Giuseppe; Barilla, David; Morabito, Michael; Ferrara, Massimiliano
Autori di Ateneo:
FERRARA Massimiliano
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unirc.it/handle/20.500.12318/169286
Pubblicato in:
DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10203-026-00577-6
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.6.0.0