Enrichment of Breadsticks with Flavoured Oils: Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activity and Technological and Sensory Properties

The present work compares the physical–chemical, organoleptic and antioxidant characteristics of breadsticks (Bs) prepared in the traditional way (BCs) with extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), and with mace (BMs), ginger (BGs) and turmeric (BTs) flavoured olive oil (FOO). Breadsticks’ water activity (aw), pH, moisture content (U.R.), total phenol (TPC) and total flavonoid (TFC) content, colorimetric analysis and texture and sensory analysis were used to evaluate the impact of the new recipes on consumer acceptance. The radical scavenging activity was also assessed by using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazine (DPPH) and 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS). The use of FOO influenced breadsticks’ colour with reference to the BG and BT enriched breadsticks, and some variability in free acidity values emerged from the comparison between EVOO and FOO. As expected, peroxide values increased in all enriched breadsticks. Moreover, all flavoured breadsticks were more resistant to lipid oxidation than BCs with an IP value of 92.44, 91.26 and 60.07 h, respectively, for BMs, BGs and BTs. The cooking process of the breadsticks at 180 °C for 25 min did not significantly impact the content of bioactive compounds. BMs showed the highest TPC and TFC with values of 996.32 and 534.41 mg/kg, respectively. Moreover, BMs showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging potential with a value of 393.91 µM TEAC/100 g extract, whereas BGs showed the highest ABTS radical scavenging activity (160.13 µM TEAC/100 g extract). Sensory quantitative descriptive analysis showed the most interesting parameters to be the intensity of toasting for BGs and the intensity of spiciness in BMs. Furthermore, BGs and BTs were found to have a slightly more pungent odour. From the texture assessment, the BC was the crumbliest breadstick, while greater crunchiness was found in the BG and BM samples.