Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIRC
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIRC

|

UNI-FIND

unirc.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Effects of Different Processing Methods on the Antinutritional Factors Present in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Effects of Different Processing Methods on the Antinutritional Factors Present in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) / Pokharel, U., Adhikari, N., Gautam, N., Poudel, R., Timsina, P., Dangal, A., Giuffre', A.M.. - In: ANALYTICA. - ISSN 2673-4532. - 5:3(2024), pp. 414-429. [10.3390/analytica5030026]
abstract:
The main aim of this study was to determine the effects of different processing methods on the antinutritional factors of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) of the Pusa Baisakhi variety. The values obtained were as follows: tannin 477 mg/100 g, oxalate 227 mg/100 g, phytate 627 mg/100 g, total phenolic content 772 mg/100 g, and saponin 2618 mg/100 g in raw mungbean, on a dry basis. The maximum reduction in tannin (63%) was observed when the mungbean was processed by the soaking and dehulling processes. The reduction achieved by soaking for 12 h and germination for 36 h was the most effective method in reducing the phytate content of mungbean (39%). The maximum reduction in saponin (22%) and oxalate (71%) was observed by autoclaving the soaked seeds. In comparison to other methods, roasting was the least effective method to reduce tannin, phytate, and oxalate. Autoclaving of the soaked seeds was the most effective method for reducing the antinutrients of mungbean among the cooking treatments. The processing methods such as soaking, dehulling, germination, roasting, raw open cooking, raw autoclaving, soaked open cooking, and autoclaving of soaked seeds significantly reduced the antinutrient contents of mungbean (p < 0.05). However, the effects of the treatments combined were more effective than those of the single process.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Pokharel, U.; Adhikari, N.; Gautam, N.; Poudel, R.; Timsina, P.; Dangal, A.; Giuffre', A. M.
Authors of the University:
GIUFFRE' Angelo Maria
Handle:
https://iris.unirc.it/handle/20.500.12318/152466
Full Text:
https://iris.unirc.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.12318/152466/426082/Pokharel_2024_Analytica_Effects%20of%20Different%20Processing_Editor.pdf
Published in:
ANALYTICA
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/5/3/26
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.0.0